|
|
|
We have been subjected to systematic mind control by the Main Stream Media.
|
And because of it, most folks now believe that if an issue such as 9/11 truth is not discussed on television, or printed in their newspaper or news magazine, then that issue simply can not exist.
All reporting of truth about 9/11 activities and groups has been blacklisted by the corporate controlled Main Stream Media, and up until now the media has effectively kept the majority of America's citizens in the dark about the truth. |
But all that is changing. |
|
|
|
|
GO TO ORIGINAL
Ventura says he regrets initial acceptance of 9/11 explanations
Associated Press - April 3, 20085:04 PM ET
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -
Jesse Ventura says he regrets not asking more questions about the 9/11 attacks when he was still governor of Minnesota.
Ventura tells the nationally syndicated radio host Alex Jones that his skepticism about the official version of events would have then carried more weight.
Among many other things, Ventura questions how the Twin Towers could have fallen so fast and in such a way as to turn so much of the wreckage into dust.
He also says that after watching the Twin Towers collapse in slow motion, it appears to him exactly like the controlled demolition of a Las Vegas hotel.
Ventura spoke on Jones' program on Wednesday. Ventura was elected as an independent in 1998 and left office in 2003 after deciding not to seek re-election.
Jones frequently questions the events surrounding 9/11 and often discusses conspiracies on his radio show and documentary films.
On the Net:
Alex Jones: http://www.infowars.com/
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
Jesse Ventura's 9/11 Press Release |
| |
 |
GO TO ORIGINAL
This coming Tuesday marks six years since the terrorist attacks on the United States which quickly and effectively gashed open a new era on planet Earth.
Six years on, and U.S. President George W. Bush is spinning off further damning testimony from two former CIA officers that this president's government had "no logical reason whatsoever" to believe there was any so-called alluring "weapons of mass destruction" in sputtering Iraq.
It's a fact made obvious years ago by the initial utter lack of retaliatory use during the well-warned invasion on the thuggish Saddam Hussein - the carrot that led the West to war simply didn't exist.
But by that time, a new scandal had come along; as it always does for those curious or critical about the strange and secretive doings of the Bush camp and a leader who uses the title "wartime president" as a blank cheque to do anything he likes.
As less partisan, less dogmatic Canadians, we would never allow our prime minister such gall. Thankfully.
But according to growing numbers of investigators... Continued
|
9/11: The elephant that will not leave
Nearly six years after the attacks of Sept. 11, the issue remains undiminished, lumbering around as American leaders still pretend it does not exist.
But the doors of truth, once guarded by ridicule, have slowly parted to reveal reasonable, rational lingering questions that cannot be dismissed by scoffing. Local area activists have joined a nationwide movement that has propelled the memory of 9/11 into political arenas that once regarded the topic taboo. On Thursday, Southern Oregon University will host David Ray Griffin, a highly regarded theologian and the author of three books questioning the Bush administration's explanation of 9/11.
This local interest, as part of a compelling new level of national interest, shows the issue is pushing its way into mainstream interest.
A Zogby International poll — an agency frequently sourced by media outlets — said half of all New Yorkers believe the U.S. allowed the attacks. Nearly two-thirds believe an unfettered investigation is warranted
GO TO ORIGINAL
|
By JOHN GLEESON, Winnipeg Sun Editor
Published: Saturday, Apr. 18, 2007
GO TO ORIGINAL |
An unbiased observer doesn't need to look beyond what's happening on the ground today in Iraq and Afghanistan to conclude the War on Terror has been a brutal, manipulative means to a transparently self-serving end.
None of this is news, however, to proponents of "9/11 Truth," a worldwide movement that seems to keep growing despite an unofficial media blackout on their questions and investigations. So what are these "Truthers" saying? .............
ARCHIEVED COPY
|
Engineers say World Trade Center collapse was planned
By JESSIE SALISBURY, Telegraph Correspondent
Published: Saturday, Apr. 28, 2007
GO TO ORIGINAL
WILTON – The premise presented by several civil engineers in the documentary “Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic” is that the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 could not have collapsed as they did simply from the impact of the airplanes or the heat of the fires.....ARCHIEVED COPY and COMPANION VIDEO
|
The curious tale of the 'other' WTC tower
Now that Rosie O'Donnell is trying to table it on The View, I guess we can talk about it here.
First, a news quiz: If, some time after the collapse of World Trade Center towers 1 and 2, a 47-storey office building in a major American city also came crashing to the ground, do you think you'd know about it?
Of course, you would........ARCHIEVED COPY
|
|
By ROSS ROMANIUK, SUN MEDIA
GO TO ORIGINAL
Conspiracy buffs are in for a big treat.
California architect Richard Gage will be in Winnipeg this week to offer his explanation of why the World Trade Centre towers collapsed on Sept. 11, 2001.
Gage has become a leading figure of the so-called 9/11 truth movement, an informal campaign from people all over the world who challenge official accounts of what happened that day.
He argues that a deliberate, controlled demolition using explosive devices is what really destroyed the twin towers that day, along with another skyscraper known as WTC 7 or Building 7. Speaking to Sun Media from his Bay Area home this weekend, Gage said few people are even aware of the third building.
'SMOKING GUN'
"It's the smoking gun of 9/11," he said. "It was a 47-storey building, not hit by an airplane, that came down into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds, at nearly freefall speed -- symmetrically, smooth, straight down."
GO TO ORIGINAL
|
|
|
|
