Google & Youtube Videos
Meet some 9/11 "Kooks"

9/11 Truth Organizations
 
               YOU ARE NOT ALONE      ;-)
9/11 VICTIMS FAMILIES
Boston 9/11 Truth
Central MA 9/11 Truth
Boston Sons of Liberty
Western MA 9/11 Truth
Flyby News - MA
Vermont 9/11 Truth
Northern NE 9/11 Truth
Maine 9/11 Truth
We Are Change - NY
New York 9/11 Truth
Rochester 9/11 Truth
Albany NY 9/11 Truth
Jersey City 9/11 Truth
Philly 9/11 Truth
9/11 Research
York PA 9/11 Truth
9/11 Truth Campus Action
DC 9/11 Truth
SF 9/11 Truth
9/11 Truth LA
9/11 Truth Movement LA
Chico 9/11 Truth
9/11 Truth Seattle
9/11 Truth Tuscon
Colorado 9/11 Visibility
9/11 Reading Room Idaho
Lone Lantern Society - IL
Ann Arbor 9/11 Truth
North Texans for 9/11 Truth
Austin Citizens for 9/11 Truth
9/11 Blogger
Visibility 9/11
SD 9/11 Truth
PA 9/11 Visibility
9/11 Truth NC
MN 9/11 Truth and Freedom
Columbus 9/11 Truth
Cincy 9/11 Truth
TulsaTruth
Houston 9/11 Truth
New Mexico 9/11 Truth
Professional
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth
Veterans for 9/11 Truth
Pilots for 9/11 Truth
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Journal of 9/11 Studies
Patriots Question 9/11
International
Vancouver 9/11 Truth
9/11 Truth ORG
9/11 Truth Bristol UK
9/11 Truth DK
9/11 Truth Europe
Swedes for 9/11 Truth
Reopen 9/11 France
Operation 9/11 Germany
9/11 Truth Madrid
9/11 Truth London
9/11oz Australia
Irish 9/11 Truth Movement
Glasgow 9/11 Truth
Berkshire Group 9/11 Truth
9/11 Truth Peterborough
Oxford 9/11 truth
Brighton 9/11 Truth
W Yorkshire Truth Campaign
9/11 Truth Skipton
9/11 Truth Cumbria
 
 
Want your 9/11 site linked?
9/11 First Responder Support

Our government assured the Fire Fighters, Police and EMT's that the choking cloud of dust and smoke at Ground Zero was safe to breathe. They did not even issue paper masks. Over 70% of the 40,000 have contracted serious respritory illnesses, and hundreds have already died as a direct result. The government that lied to them has now callously ignored and abandoned them.




Please consider helping these dedicated First Responder Foundations with whatever financial support you can
.



All donations to these Foundations are 100% tax deductible.
~ Thank You ~






WTC dust particle
micro photographs

Proof of deadly toxic compounds breathed by First Responders with no protection.


Typical particles in this material include fiberglass, slag wool, asbestos, glass fragments, plastic fragments and droplets, wood.


 
 
 
 
 
 




Did Osama do 9/11?
The FBI says NO !



iceberg


Download this Printable 33 page 9/11 Primer to help enlighten friends, family and co-workers.




~
Contact Us  
~



NIST Final WTC7 Report Conclusion
is an Absolute Impossibility!

The conclusion of NIST's 10,000 page report that took seven years to produce claims fires, coupled with "thermal expansion" and unusual truss design caused core column 79 to fail, leading to a complete "progressive collapse".

The absolute impossibility mentioned in the headline above is evident in their computer simulation of the physical copllapse as initiated by core column 79. In reviewing the individual screenshots, and when seen in the non-NIST animation of their screenshots below, it becomes apparent that the collapse they postulate is totally different from all videos of the actual collapse.



In their simulation, the East side of WTC7, where column 79 was located, fell completely down taking over 25% of the building to the ground, while the balance of the building was as yet unaffected.

In reality, every video of this collapse (seen from the West, North and East) showed the building maintaining total integrity of the complete roof line and all four sides as well. It collapsed in a synchronous manner, as if it had been constructed on a massive elevator and someone had pressed the "down" button.





 

 


The only way this massive steel framed high rise could have collapsed as it was actually seen to, was if every core column failed simultaneoulsy. (The result of a controlled demolition, and ONLY a controlled demolition)

 



 

NIST has taken their best shot at explaining how and why WTC7 collapsed, and they have failed miserably. They reviewed every possible scenario, except one - a serious and careful examination into a pre-planned controlled demolition. And that theory is the only one that fits all of the physical evidence completely.

It is long overdue for a new IMPARTIAL investigation into this heinous crime, and it's up to you, and me, to make it happen any way we can.

b



Breaking News! NIST admits WTC7 Freefall Speed

Amazing! Being backed into a corner by irrefutable facts, NIST has now officially accepted that WTC7 came down with the acceleration of gravity.

They still couch it as a phase in a 5.4 second interval they claim matches the 5.4 seconds required for their model to collapse 18 floors.

The starting point of their 5.4 second interval is totally arbitrary. This new video highlights the August 26 technical briefing and allows Sunder and Gross to shoot holes in their own feet. Part II, which is planned to come out in a week or two, will go into detail about the implications of freefall.

Please note that it is a complete physical impossibility for any section of floors to fall at free fall speed. All 47 floors were supported by a cross-braced steel structure with concrete, and that structure has a far greater resistance to collapse than just air.

 



b

Never seen before!

Fox news 5 reports WTC 7 collapse before it happens

 

On 9/11 the BBC infamously reported live that WTC7 had collapsed, with no fatalities – 30 minutes before it actually did. Made for great comedy watching the reporter stand in front of a large window with WTC7 still clearly standing as she reported its collapse.

Now, for the first time ever, here’s video of Fox 5 doing the exact same thing, but they were only off by only 30 seconds in their announcing the collapse before it happened. They report that it collapsed, and speculate on the smoke being the remains of WTC7, and then 30 seconds later they actually watch it collapse, live on their monitors.

The anchor went on to comment; “We are seeing video today that only Hollywood could have produced in another time”. “We are seeing the Twin Towers come apart, right in front of our eyes… just now we saw another building that was part of the complex, go down

And then he made this observation; ”it is so unbelievable, it is so surreal…”. He had no idea how right he was. Reporting building collapses before they happen, that’s a textbook definition of surreal.
 

b

 

Featured New 9-11 Truth Organization

 
firefighters for 911 truth.org

Courage
On September 11, 2001 hundreds of our Brothers had the courage to stand up to the actions of Terrorists, and enter those towers to help rescue people and extinguish fires. 343 firefighters and 60 police officers gave their lives standing up for what they believed in… helping others in their time of need. Well, my Brothers and Sisters, it is our turn to show some courage. We must have the courage to confront the horrors of that day, the humility to consider we don’t know the “whole” story, the willingness to educate ourselves, and the responsibility to inform others. We must have the courage to stand up to those who are stopping a true investigation into who murdered more than 3,000 innocent civilians and over 400 of our Brothers.

We must demand answers and accountability for why hundreds of New York Firemen didn’t hear evacuation orders, how 3 towers collapsed so quickly and so explosively, and why thousands of rescue workers and civilians alike were not warned of the extremely dangerous atmosphere that was known to exist.

If you think the media or our government has given us the answers, think again. If you think this can’t happen again, think again. Seven years later most Americans haven’t even heard of Tower 7. Seven years later, most Americans don’t know thousands more of those rescue workers are sick, and many are dying from their exposures at Ground Zero. Seven years later, the FBI still hasn’t listed Osama Bin Laden as “wanted” for the 9/11 attacks. This is incredible–they are the lead investigators, and they don’t have enough evidence to put him on the “most wanted” list for those attacks? So, why do so many Americans believe he was behind it? Why are we at war over it? Do you know what evidence there is? The destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, incomplete answers, and abysmal accountability is disgusting and unacceptable.

We must all look at the evidence with an open mind and make rational unbiased judgments. Remember, you don’t have to be an expert to sit on a jury, and you have the right to be critical of, and demand answers from the “experts”. Take the time to gather facts, and have the courage to ask for more. If you come to the same conclusion as the FBI, and don’t place him on your “most wanted” list, then have the courage to help find those responsible for the deaths of so many of our Brothers and Sisters. We all need to show some courage by demanding answers and justice!!


firefighters for 911 truth.org

b

Chicago Firefighters Discuss 9/11 During a Street Action


A few Chicago Firefighters doing some street action in support of 9/11 Truth, and in support of firefightersfor911truth.org

Speaking about the collapse of Building Seven based on the fire that was present, one Chicago Firefighter states “If that building’s going to go down, no Firefighter would ever enter a building again”

 

b
The World Trade Towers were designed to survive a collision by a Jumbo Jet

Because a B-25 Bomber crashed into the Empire State Building on July 28, 1945, and because the World Trade Towers were to be so tall, they were designed from the beginning to survive a crash by a fully loaded Boeing 707.

Frank DeMartini, the Chief Construction Engineer of the WTC complex, gave an interview on January 21, 2001, and spoke confidently regarding the crash-worthiness of the design.

This interview was done in his office in the North Tower, about 8 floors above the crash location. He was at work the morning of 9/11, and has been reported missing and presumed dead.

 
 

b


What was Larry Silverstein describing with his "pull it" remark in the PBS interview?


Larry Silverstein was the owner of WTC7, and long term leaseholder of WTC1 and WTC2 on that fateful day of September 11th, 2001

Did he commit a classic Freudian slip with the "pull it" remark?


 

 Transcription of Silverstein's actual statement;

";I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And then they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

VIEW VIDEO EXCERPT


Many people, even some seasoned 9/11 Truthers, are unsure of the true meaning of Larry Silverstein’s infamous "pull it" comment made during his PBS interview.  Some believe he might possibly have meant "pull the fire fighting contingent", as his recent attempted retraction states.

A review of the facts tends to indicate otherwise.

Larry Silverstein, principal of Silverstein Properties, is a multi-billionaire, and is revered within his circle of influence.  However, unlike Donald Trump, Larry is no camera-loving media magnet, and therefore is simply not used to the flattering attention a professional media crew can bring. I believe Silverstein was caught up in his 15 minutes of fame, and in an unconscious attempt to appear suave and just a little bit “hip”, carelessly revealed the fact that his WTC7 was wired for a controlled demolition far in advance of the attack, and here’s why;

  1. As we all know by now, "pull" is indisputably a construction industry term for initiating a pre-prepared controlled demolition.  Silverstein is a true commercial real estate mogul, has been in the business of buying, selling and managing NYC high-rise buildings for many years, and is knowledgeable of their construction and demolition.  He is considered savvier in the NYC Skyscraper business than Trump.  This fact is not an absolute guarantee his "pull it" comment meant "demolish" during that interview, but it is a guarantee he clearly understood that term to mean a controlled demolition from his everyday professional life.
  1. He could not have been speaking of “pulling” the firefighters from WTC7, as there were no firefighters inside at that time.  Earlier in the day the building was completely evacuated and the building sealed against further entry.  The Fire Department Commander would have been 100% aware of this fact, and would have informed Silverstein there was no one to "pull".  Consequently their conversation could not have centered on removing people to prevent any further "terrible loss of life".  That whole comment would not have been mentioned by Silverstein during the interview, because that issue was off the table.
  1. The most revealing clue comes from an analysis of the grammatical structure of Silverstein's statement, and reinforces the fact he could only be referring to demolition, not evacuation.  Anyone trying to convey that they decided to remove all personnel for safety reasons might have phrased that sentence more like this;

"And then they made that decision to pull, and thankfully we were able to get everyone out just before the building collapsed.”

But certainly not;

"And then they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

The words "decision to pull" are directly coupled with "we watched the building collapse".  They pulled, (then) it collapsed. There is no reference to the lives saved, in the nick of time that his righteous decision was able to accomplish.  This guy is in the media limelight with a puff-piece interview, tooting his own horn, yet his statement completely failed to mention the most salient point of the whole episode; He saved lives by making a great decision.

That's because he wasn't pulling out people, he was pulling down a building.