Our government assured the Fire Fighters, Police and EMT's that
the choking cloud of dust
and smoke at Ground Zero
was safe to breathe. They did not even issue paper masks.
Over 70% of the 40,000 have contracted serious respritory illnesses,
and hundreds have already died as a direct result. The government
that lied to them has now callously ignored and abandoned them.
Please
consider helping these dedicated First Responder Foundations with
whatever financial support you can.
NIST Final WTC7 Report Conclusion
is an Absolute Impossibility!
The conclusion of NIST's 10,000 page report
that took seven years to produce claims fires, coupled
with "thermal expansion" and unusual truss design
caused core column 79 to fail, leading to a complete "progressive
collapse".
The absolute impossibility mentioned in the headline above
is evident in their computer simulation of the physical
copllapse as initiated by core column 79. In reviewing
the individual screenshots, and when seen in the non-NIST
animation of their screenshots below, it becomes apparent
that the collapse they postulate is totally different
from all videos of the actual collapse.
In their simulation, the East side of WTC7, where column 79 was
located, fell completely down taking over 25% of the building to
the ground, while the balance of the building was as yet unaffected.
In reality, every video of this collapse (seen from the West, North
and East) showed the building maintaining total integrity of the
complete roof line and all four sides as well. It collapsed in a
synchronous manner, as if it had been constructed on a massive elevator
and someone had pressed the "down" button.
The only way this massive steel framed high rise could have collapsed
as it was actually seen to, was if every core column failed simultaneoulsy.
(The result of a controlled demolition, and ONLY a controlled
demolition)
NIST has taken their best shot at explaining how and why WTC7
collapsed, and they have failed miserably. They reviewed every possible
scenario, except one - a serious and careful examination into a
pre-planned controlled demolition. And that theory is the only one
that fits all of the physical evidence completely.
It is long overdue for a new IMPARTIAL investigation into this heinous
crime, and it's up to you, and me, to make it happen any way we
can.
Breaking News! NIST admits WTC7 Freefall Speed
Amazing! Being backed into a corner by irrefutable facts, NIST has
now officially accepted that WTC7 came down with the acceleration
of gravity.
They still couch it as a phase in a 5.4 second interval they claim
matches the 5.4 seconds required for their model to collapse 18
floors.
The starting point of their 5.4 second interval is totally arbitrary.
This new video highlights the August 26 technical briefing and allows
Sunder and Gross to shoot holes in their own feet. Part II, which
is planned to come out in a week or two, will go into detail about
the implications of freefall.
Please note that it is a complete physical impossibility for any
section of floors to fall at free fall speed. All 47 floors were
supported by a cross-braced steel structure with concrete, and that
structure has a far greater resistance to collapse than just air.
Never
seen before!
Fox news 5 reports WTC 7 collapse before it happens
On 9/11 the BBC infamously reported live that
WTC7 had collapsed, with no fatalities – 30 minutes before it actually
did. Made for great comedy watching the reporter stand in front of
a large window with WTC7 still clearly standing as she reported its
collapse.
Now, for the first time ever, here’s video of Fox 5 doing the exact
same thing, but they were only off by only 30 seconds in their announcing
the collapse before it happened. They report that it collapsed, and
speculate on the smoke being the remains of WTC7, and then 30 seconds
later they actually watch it collapse, live on their monitors.
The anchor went on to comment; “We are seeing video today that
only Hollywood could have produced in another time”. “We are
seeing the Twin Towers come apart, right in front of our eyes… just
now we saw another building that was part of the complex, go down”
And then he made this observation; ”it is so unbelievable, it is
so surreal…”. He had no idea how right he was. Reporting building
collapses before they happen, that’s a textbook definition of surreal.
Courage
On September 11, 2001 hundreds of our Brothers had the courage to
stand up to the actions of Terrorists, and enter those towers to help
rescue people and extinguish fires. 343 firefighters and 60 police
officers gave their lives standing up for what they believed in… helping
others in their time of need. Well, my Brothers and Sisters, it is
our turn to show some courage. We must have the courage to confront
the horrors of that day, the humility to consider we don’t know the
“whole” story, the willingness to educate ourselves, and the responsibility
to inform others. We must have the courage to stand up to those who
are stopping a true investigation into who murdered more than 3,000
innocent civilians and over 400 of our Brothers.
We must demand answers and accountability for why hundreds of New
York Firemen didn’t hear evacuation orders, how 3 towers collapsed
so quickly and so explosively, and why thousands of rescue workers
and civilians alike were not warned of the extremely dangerous atmosphere
that was known to exist.
If you think the media or our government has given us the answers,
think again. If you think this can’t happen again, think again. Seven
years later most Americans haven’t even heard of Tower 7. Seven years
later, most Americans don’t know thousands more of those rescue workers
are sick, and many are dying from their exposures at Ground Zero.
Seven years later, the FBI still hasn’t listed Osama Bin Laden as
“wanted” for the 9/11 attacks. This is incredible–they are the lead
investigators, and they don’t have enough evidence to put him on the
“most wanted” list for those attacks? So, why do so many Americans
believe he was behind it? Why are we at war over it? Do you know what
evidence there is? The destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice,
incomplete answers, and abysmal accountability is disgusting and unacceptable.
We must all look at the evidence with an open mind and make rational
unbiased judgments. Remember, you don’t have to be an expert to sit
on a jury, and you have the right to be critical of, and demand answers
from the “experts”. Take the time to gather facts, and have the courage
to ask for more. If you come to the same conclusion as the FBI, and
don’t place him on your “most wanted” list, then have the courage
to help find those responsible for the deaths of so many of our Brothers
and Sisters. We all need to show some courage by demanding answers
and justice!!
Chicago
Firefighters Discuss 9/11 During a Street Action
A
few Chicago Firefighters doing some street action in support of
9/11 Truth, and in support of firefightersfor911truth.org
Speaking about the collapse of Building Seven based on the fire
that was present, one Chicago Firefighter states “If that building’s
going to go down, no Firefighter would ever enter a building again”
The
World Trade Towers were designed to survive a collision by a Jumbo
Jet
Because
a B-25 Bomber crashed into the Empire State Building on July 28,
1945, and because the World Trade Towers were to be so tall, they
were designed from the beginning to survive a crash by a fully loaded
Boeing 707.
Frank DeMartini, the Chief Construction Engineer of the WTC complex,
gave an interview on January 21, 2001, and spoke confidently regarding
the crash-worthiness of the design.
This interview was done in his office in the North Tower, about
8 floors above the crash location. He was at work the morning of
9/11, and has been reported missing and presumed dead.
What
was Larry Silverstein describing with his "pull it" remark
in the PBS interview?
Larry Silverstein
was the owner of WTC7, and long term leaseholder of WTC1 and WTC2
on that fateful day of September 11th, 2001
Did he commit a classic Freudian slip with the "pull it"
remark?
Transcription of Silverstein's
actual statement;
";I remember getting a call from the, er, fire
department commander, telling me that they were not sure
they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said,
"We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the
smartest thing to do is pull it." And then they made
that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
Many people, even some seasoned 9/11 Truthers, are unsure
of the true meaning of Larry Silverstein’s infamous
"pull it" comment made during his PBS interview.
Some believe he might possibly have meant "pull the fire
fighting contingent", as his recent attempted retraction
states.
A review of the facts tends to indicate otherwise.
Larry Silverstein, principal of Silverstein
Properties, is a multi-billionaire, and is revered within
his circle of influence. However, unlike Donald Trump,
Larry is no camera-loving media magnet, and therefore is simply
not used to the flattering attention a professional media
crew can bring. I believe Silverstein was caught up in his
15 minutes of fame, and in an unconscious attempt to appear
suave and just a little bit “hip”, carelessly
revealed the fact that his WTC7 was wired for a controlled
demolition far in advance of the attack, and here’s
why;
As we all know by now, "pull" is indisputably
a construction industry term for initiating a pre-prepared
controlled demolition. Silverstein is a true commercial
real estate mogul, has been in the business of buying,
selling and managing NYC high-rise buildings for many
years, and is knowledgeable of their construction and
demolition. He is considered savvier in the NYC
Skyscraper business than Trump. This fact is not
an absolute guarantee his "pull it" comment
meant "demolish" during that interview, but
it is a guarantee he clearly understood that term to mean
a controlled demolition from his everyday professional
life.
He could not have been speaking of “pulling”
the firefighters from WTC7, as there were no firefighters
inside at that time. Earlier in the day the building
was completely evacuated and the building sealed against
further entry. The Fire Department Commander would
have been 100% aware of this fact, and would have informed
Silverstein there was no one to "pull".
Consequently their conversation could not have centered
on removing people to prevent any further "terrible
loss of life". That whole comment would not
have been mentioned by Silverstein during the interview,
because that issue was off the table.
The most revealing clue comes from an analysis of the
grammatical structure of Silverstein's statement, and
reinforces the fact he could only be referring to demolition,
not evacuation. Anyone trying to convey that they
decided to remove all personnel for safety reasons might
have phrased that sentence more like this;
"And then they made that decision to
pull, and thankfully we were able to get everyone out just
before the building collapsed.”
But certainly not;
"And then they made that decision to pull and we
watched the building collapse.”
The words "decision to pull" are directly coupled
with "we watched the building collapse". They
pulled, (then) it collapsed. There is no reference
to the lives saved, in the nick of time that his righteous
decision was able to accomplish. This guy is in the
media limelight with a puff-piece interview, tooting his own
horn, yet his statement completely failed to mention the most
salient point of the whole episode; He saved lives by making
a great decision.
That's because he wasn't pulling out people, he was pulling
down a building.